In saying this we can see that there is actually spiritual ramifications of backpage women seeking women union to a heathen prostitute, and that our relation to her is spiritually unacceptable. That, of course, is the point of the passage. Since such fornication is incompatible with the kingdom (6:9), a willful joining with the forces of Satan’s kingdom in this way is treason. It is not as some Platonists or proto-Gnostics were apparently saying, “Food for the stomach and the stomach for food,” that is, sexual relations are purely physical. No, there is spiritual alignment with the Devil in willful intercourse with a harlot. But this is not the same thing as saying that the one-flesh relationship is in itself a spiritual relationship, one way or the other. Were it so, Paul would have told the married believer to flee from her spouse just as he tells the believer to flee immorality. As we shall see later (in chap. 8), it is probably that very question (“Is being married to an unbeliever in itself acceptable, or should we divorce?) that brought about the admonition about desertion so much argued over today. It all depends upon whether the relationship is licit or licitly entered into-whether or not it is acceptable to a Holy God. 48
The new Ephesians passage alludes to this new Genesis text message but really does very only regarding the believer’s relation to Jesus. Paul is pinpointing the sort of Christ-Chapel union. It’s a living union and you can, predicated on of numerous life-in addition to personal, a good commitment that’s long lasting-little will ever separate the latest believer regarding Lord. Paul merely wants to keep in mind that the newest partnership of men and you can people is similar on part of being an income partnership. Continue reading “For this reason i ending that the that-skin relationship isn’t a spiritual union, regardless of if a relationship ifications”